Posts tagged with “russian literature”

Posted 1 year ago
Chekhov’s intellectual was a man who combined the deepest human decency of which man is capable with an almost ridiculous inability to put his ideals and principles into action; a man devoted to moral beauty, the welfare of his people, the welfare of the universe, but unable in his private life to do anything useful; frittering away his provincial existence in a haze of utopian dreams; knowing exactly what is good, what is worthwhile living for, but at the same time sinking lower and lower in the mud of a humdrum existence, unhappy in love, hopelessly inefficient in everything—a good man who cannot make good. This is the character that passes—in the guise of a doctor, a student, a village teacher, many other professional people—all through Chekhov’s stories
Posted 2 years ago

And now, here in this wearisome fortress, I often ask myself, as my thoughts wander back to the past: why did I not wish to tread that way, thrown open by destiny, where soft joys and ease of soul were awaiting me? No, I could never have become habituated to such a fate! I am like a sailor born and bred on the deck of a pirate brig: his soul has grown accustomed to storms and battles; but, once let him be case upon the shore, and he chafes, he pines away, however invitingly the shady groves allure, however brightly shines the peaceful sun. The live-long day he paces the sandy shore, hearkens to the monotonous murmur of the onrushing waves, and gazes into the misty distance: lo! yonder, upon the pale line dividing the blue deep from the grey clouds, is there not glancing the longed-for sail, at first like the wing of a seagull, but little by little severing itself from the foam of the billows and, with even course, drawing nigh to the desert harbour?

A Hero of Our Time by Mikhail Lermontov, cover illustration by Edward Gorey

cover image via fuckyeahrussianliterature

Posted 2 years ago

ryannapier:

And how about that published article on ecclesiastical courts, eh??

(via comiques)

Posted 2 years ago
It was too frightening to be under the burden of all the insoluble questions of life, and he gave himself to the first amusements that came along, only so as to forget them. He frequented every possible society, drank heavily, bought paintings, built, but above all, he read.

He read, he read everything that came to hand, so that, on coming home, while the footmen were still undressing him, he would take up a book and read - and from reading he would pass into sleep, and from sleep to chatter in drawing rooms and the club, from chatter to carousing and women, from carousing back to chatter, reading, and wine. Drinking wine became more and more of a physical and at the same time moral need for him. […] Only when he had drunk a bottle or two of wine did he become dimly aware that the tangled, terrible knot of life, which had formerly terrified him, was not as frightening as it seemed to him. With a buzzing in his head, chattering, listening to conversation, or reading after dinner and supper, he constantly saw that knot from some one of its sides. But only under the influence of wine did he say to himself: “Never mind. I’ll disentangle it - I’ve got a ready explanation right here. But I have no time now - I’ll think it all over later!” But this later never came.

On an empty stomach, in the morning, all the old questions seemed as insoluble and frightening as ever, and Pierre would hastily seize a book and was glad when somebody came to see him.

“Sometimes Pierre remembered stories he had heard about how soldiers at war, taking cover under enemy fire, when there is nothing to do, try to find some occupation for themselves so as to endure the danger more easily. And to Pierre all people seemed to be such soldiers, saving themselves from life: some with ambition, some with cards, some with drafting laws, some with women, some with playthings, some with horses, some with affairs of state. ‘Nothing is either trivial or important, it’s all the same; only save yourself from it as best you can!’ thought Pierre.”

[Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace, Vol. II, Part Five, Chapter I - translated by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky, p. 538]

Posted 2 years ago

llustrations by Gennady Yepifanov (Г. Епифанова) for Pushkin’s Queen of Spades, 1966 (via A Journey Round My Skull)

The Queen of Spades (English translation by Natalie Duddington, full text - original Russian language Пиковая дама)

Posted 2 years ago
In most of [Chekhov’s] stories, from our red-blooded national-weekly point of view, nothing happens. His characters have an annoying way of walking back and forth, up and down, from one end of the room to the other - a trick so frequent that it seems almost like a hall-mark. In the “Three Sisters” which was loyally and sensitively performed by Miss Le Gallienne’s Civic Repertory Theater last season, an otherwise friendly audience began to titter at the characters’ monotonous insistence that the were ‘so tired,’ that they had ‘such a headache,’ that they were ‘worn out.’ These trivial repetitions, when they begin to get on our nerves, sometimes have power to poison a whole book, a whole play, a whole literature, and Americans have always been peculiarly irritated by such traits in the Russians. But, at bottom, Chekhov is, like all great creators, profoundly un-depressing, un-sordid, un-dreary. No matter what manner of life, hopeless and gray, is depicted, the reality of the people, the beauty of the brief, sure strokes by which the characteristic is revealed and what is secret, inviolable, in each human unit is left unrevealed, are immensely stirring and exciting.

“Chekhov and the Americans”, by R. Littell in The New Republic, 22 June 1927, li. 124-5 [reprinted in Anton Chekhov: the Critical Heritage  ed. by Victor Emeljanow, Routledge, 1981 pp. 320-321]

(This may be the year every single friend of mine who is not already reading Chekhov religiously receives a copy of his short stories and/or a theatre ticket from me.)

Posted 2 years ago

Woody Allen’s Love and Death (1975) - Assassinating Napoleon 

“You’re being all pantheistic again” - happy birthday Woody Allen!

Posted 2 years ago

I accept all blame and pick up the gauntlet of your challenge with a further, gentle push to tip you over the edge: 

The carriage and horses had long been led out on the other side and hitched up, and the sun had already half disappeared, and the evening frost had covered the pools by the crossing with stars, but Pierre and Andrei, to the astonishment of the lackeys, coachmen, and ferrymen, were still standing on the ferry and talking.

“If there is God and if there is a future life, then there is truth, there is virtue; and man’s highest happiness consists in striving to attain them. We must live, we must love, we must believe,” said Pierre, “that we do not live only today on this scrap of earth, but have lived and will live eternally there, in the all” (he pointed to the sky). Prince Andrei stood with his elbow resting on the rail of the ferry, and, listening to Pierre, did not take his eyes off the red gleam of the sun on the blue floodwaters. Pierre fell silent. It was completely still. The ferry had long been moored, and only the waves of the current lapped with a faint sound against the ferry’s bottom. It seemed to Prince Andrei that this splash of waves made a refrain to Pierre’s words, saying: “It’s true, I believe it.”

Prince Andrei sighed, and with a luminous, childlike, tender gaze looked into the flushed, rapturous face of Pierre, who still felt timid before his superior friend.

“Yes, if only it were so!” he said. “Anyhow, let’s go and get in,” Prince Andrei added, and, stepping off the ferry, he looked at the sky Pierre had pointed to, and for the first time since Austerlitz saw that high, eternal sky he had seen as he lay on the battlefield, and something long asleep, something that was best in him, suddenly awakened, joyful and young in his soul. This feeling disappeared as soon as Prince Andrei re-entered the habitual conditions of life, but he knew that this feeling, which he did not know how to develop, lived in him. The meeting with Pierre marked an epoch for Prince Andrei, from which began what, while outwardly the same, was in his inner world a new life.

(War & Peace, Volume Two, Part II, xii, p.389)

Thus Tolstoy invented the Joycean epiphany, and the post-classical modern bromance. (Let me know when you start reading…)

Posted 2 years ago
I first read War and Peace aged 15 (in an all-English translation) and what I loved most about it was its length. It was a book you could live in - a book that offered you a grand and fully furnished second life. The philosophical reflections were the best parts. Reading these, I felt as if I’d been invited into a Russian drawing room to discuss world affairs with the author himself.

Maureen Freely | guardian.co.uk

I first read War and Peace two weeks after my twenty-first birthday. It took me over two months but I was completely bowled over by it. I started studying Russian, got a dramaturge job on a script about Tolstoy, directed Anna Karenina

Upon second reading it still feels like that: a book that offers you a glorious, rich, detailed second life in a different world. It’s all strangely familiar and yet new: new details are coming to the fore, I have different opinions on certain characters, and I am intensely drawn to the philosophy much more than the plot. The Richard Pevear/Larissa Volokhonsky translation is a joy.

Posted 2 years ago

The Last Days of Leo Tolstoy: 100 Years Ago | Open Culture

100 years ago today (November 20), Leo Tolstoy, who gave us two major classics in the Russian tradition, Anna Karenina and War & Peacedied at Astapovo, a small, remote train station in the heart of Russia. Pneumonia was the official cause. His death came just weeks after Tolstoy, then 82 years old, made a rather dramatic decision. He left his wife, his comfortable estate and his wealth and traveled 26 hours to Sharmardino, where Tolstoy’s sister Marya lived, and where he planned to live the remainder of his life in a small, rented hut. (Elif Batuman has more on this.) But then he pushed on, boarding a train to the Caucasus. And it proved to be more than his already weak constitution could bear. Rather amazingly, the footage above brings you back to Tolstoy’s very last days, and right to his deathbed itself. This clip comes from a 1969 BBC series Civilisation: A Personal View by Kenneth Clarkand these days you can still find copies of Clark’s accompanying book kicking around online.

Great video, but the commentary - from 1969 - mentions that Tolstoy ran away, aged 82, from his “poor demented wife.” How patronising! I am a big fan of Tolstoy’s work, but he was a complicated and self-contradictory man with a strange Christ-complex, and so many biographers who become entranced by the depth of his philosophy and his literary skill completely fail to see his wife’s perspective. 

Sofya Tolstoya was utterly devoted to her husband. She bore him seventeen children - out of which thirteen survived - while he preached abstinence and celibacy. She fed him, their children, and dozens of devoted fans and acolytes he invited to stay with them as he promoted his peculiar version of religious philosophy, which involved vegetarianism and fasting (but he ate meat on the sly). She was in charge of the estate’s finances, and responsible for the lives of workers living on it (and off its produce), as Count Tolstoy preached the abolition of serfdom but nonetheless kept servants. She struggled to preserve the copyright to his works so that their children could have a relatively safe economic future even in the case of a revolution, as Tolstoy’s creepy secretary Chertkoff persuaded him to give up all income derived from his publications to the people of Russia (good sentiment, but if in a patriarchal society the father doesn’t earn anything it makes a large family’s life quite tricky, doesn’t it). Besides, without her there would be no War and Peace, nor Anna Karenina: she stayed up nights to transcribe his illegible handwriting before his drafts could be sent to publishers. 

For her sins, she was a naive but ambitious and spoiled rich girl when she married him, aged eighteen (he was thirty-five - the story of their courtship is mirrored in great detail in Levin and Kitty’s in Anna Karenina), and the shock of finding herself in the arms of this successful writer and penniless Count in the middle of a vast wild country, after a life spent as the daughter of the court doctor must have been enormous. She coped with it by learning to run the estate, and gaining a degree of intellectual independence and education unimaginable for a woman of the Russian high society at the time.

As he became more and more regarded as a sage and gradually lost touch with everyday life, she began to struggle and felt lost. She had devoted her entire life to him, and suddenly he seemed not to care about anything ordinary - anything that she had come to regard as her domain - anymore. Only the great topics of the world interested him. She suffered a nervous breakdown and attempted suicide various times, some say, in order to get his attention. Perhaps, but read her diaries and you’ll find that she was burdened with misery of her own, which only worsened during middle age. They rowed like crazy, but then also made peace with intense and passionate words (through their diaries, which they kept daily, and exchanged every night in order to know exactly what the other was thinking or writing - something he insisted upon), often resolving their clashes through fierce lovemaking. It seems to me that they couldn’t live together without fighting, and yet they couldn’t be apart.

When Tolstoy finally ran away from home to pursue his fantasy of asceticism away from all human bonds he fell too ill to travel any further than the train station at Astapovo (now called Lev Tolstoy Station). Sofya Tolstoya travelled there as soon as she heard the news, and waited for three days outside in the freezing snow to see him. He was in agony and probably not conscious for most of the time, but his secretary did not allow her to see him until it was too late. It’s a sad story this story of genius, mania and love, but one that can’t be written without one character or the other.