byronic :: mad bad and dangerous to know

Quote Post
The philosopher Slavoj Zizek enjoys a good joke. Here’s one of my favourites: two men, having had a drink or two, go to the theatre, where they become thoroughly bored with the play. One feels a pressing need to urinate, so he tells his friend to mind his seat while he goes to find a toilet. “I think I saw one down the corridor outside,” says his friend. The man wanders down the corridor, but finds no WC. Wandering further, he walks through a door and sees a plant pot. After copiously urinating into it, he returns to his seat. His friend says, “What a pity! You missed the best part. Some fellow just came on the stage and pissed in that plant pot.”

This gag perfectly describes the argument of Zizek’s new book on violence. Drunkenly watching the boring spectacle of the world stage, we might feel an overwhelming need to follow the call of nature somewhere discreet. Yet, in our bladder-straining self-interest, we lose sight of the objective reality of the play and our implication in its action. We are oblivious to the fact that we are pissing on stage for the world to see.

So it is with violence. Our subjective outrage at the facts of violence – a suicide bombing, a terrorist attack, the assassination of a political figure – blinds us to the objective violence of the world, a violence where we are perpetrators and not just innocent bystanders. All we see are apparently inexplicable acts that disturb the supposed peace of everyday life. We consistently overlook the objective or what Zizek calls “systemic” violence, endemic to our socio-economic order.

Simon Critchley reviews Violence, By Slavoj Zizek - The Independent

He continues: 

“The main ambition of this book is to bring together subjective violence with the objective violence that is its underside and precondition. “Systemic violence is thus something like the notorious ‘dark matter’ of physics,” Zizek writes: invisible to naked eye. Zizek offers a rather cool and at times cruel analysis of the varieties of objective violence. He asks tolerant multicultural Western liberals to suspend our outraged responses to acts of violence and turn instead to the real substance of the global situation. (…)

At the heart of Zizek’s book is an argument about ideology that has been a powerful, constant feature of his work since he burst onto the intellectual scene in the late 1980s. Far from existing in some post-ideological world at the end of history where all problems can be diagnosed with neo-liberal economics and self-serving assertions of human rights, ideology completely structures our lived reality. This ideology might be subjectively invisible, but it is objectively real. Each of us is onstage, pissing in that plant pot.”

(Italian friends, please could you send a translated copy of Slavoj Zizek’s book Violence to Roberto Saviano on my behalf, and append this review to it? Thank you.)

View Comments
Posted on Friday, December 17, 2010. Tagged with: Roberto SavianoSlavoj Ziezekcritical theoryideologyphilosophyriotsthe modern worldviolencesent'amméSimon Critchley
37
Notes
  1. untraveling liked this
  2. asktheangels reblogged this from octagon-surgeon
  3. timetorun liked this
  4. psychoza liked this
  5. lyssahumana liked this
  6. dameauxcamelias liked this
  7. l-amour-a-trois liked this
  8. alainrichert liked this
  9. opalescent liked this
  10. uminuscula liked this
  11. uminuscula reblogged this from ratak-monodosico
  12. calm179 reblogged this from ratak-monodosico
  13. sadburro liked this
  14. oh-anayatzin liked this
  15. okimago liked this
  16. billydalto liked this
  17. ecantwell liked this
  18. yumwatch liked this
  19. empirevalley reblogged this from ratak-monodosico
  20. quatsch liked this
  21. bemorenice liked this
  22. genericnotes liked this
  23. chutesdimages reblogged this from byronic
  24. icouldsleepforathousandyears reblogged this from byronic
  25. sirjolt liked this
  26. seavsme reblogged this from catherinewillis
  27. catherinewillis reblogged this from tragos
  28. tragos reblogged this from byronic
  29. tragos liked this
  30. uomoinpolvere liked this
  31. uomoinpolvere reblogged this from byronic
  32. byronic posted this

Comments powered by Disqus

byronic :: mad bad and dangerous to know About Me
I love films, baseball, whales, good food, and guys in ties.
I teach literature, film and cultural studies at university.
I worship at the Church of Springsteen.
Sometimes I write reviews.
You may now also call me Doctor.

Byronic
[bai'ra:-nik] 1. Characteristic of, or after the manner of Byron or his poetry. 2. quasi-n. pl. [after Philippics.] Declamatory utterances or invectives in the style of Byron. 3. Byronic hero: prominent literary character type of the Romantic period, whose characteristics include: extraordinary intelligence and perception; high level of education and intellectual prowess; arrogance; cunning and manipulation; emotional conflictedness; moodiness; self-criticism and introspection; self-destructive behaviour; aesthetic sophistication; dark mysterious beauty; powers of attraction; seductiveness and sexual perversion; world-weariness; distaste for social institutions and norms; disrespect of social ranks; being an outcast, an outlaw, or an exile.

Contact

Ask me a question
Send me your Guys in Ties

My Other Homes
Flickr
Flavors.me
JunkiePop
Movies in Frames
No Borders Magazine
Fuck Yeah Bruce Springsteen
Previous Next