byronic :: mad bad and dangerous to know

Text Post

Anonymous, or: ludicrousness, redefined.

I saw Anonymous today and HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.

I could write a review when I stop rolling on the floor laughing, or you could read this one instead (via undertrees).

View Comments
Posted on Tuesday, October 25, 2011. Tagged with: Anonymousthe Shakespeare conspiracyShakespeare Authorship questionHA HA HAludicrous stuffso ludicrousreview
42
Notes
  1. mccyp likes this
  2. lizlemming likes this
  3. ecantwell likes this
  4. tragos said: I was really hoping it would suck. I’m so glad that it was ha-ha funny sucked too.
  5. tragos likes this
  6. kateoplis likes this
  7. after-the-ellipsis likes this
  8. derring-do reblogged this from baker-street and added:
    That review is beautifully angry. Baker-Street questioned why...film, rather than...
  9. tesseralharmonics likes this
  10. itsfrantastic likes this
  11. jumblejo likes this
  12. therodentqueen likes this
  13. andothercuriosities likes this
  14. thewhywhygirl likes this
  15. maritsa-met likes this
  16. abbynormalsomething likes this
  17. curiousgeorgiana likes this
  18. theraptorwhomurderedlove likes this
  19. allthatulovewillbcarriedaway likes this
  20. zforzelma reblogged this from byronic and added:
    Oh jeeze.
  21. mimesandpunishment reblogged this from byronic and added:
    I’d love to see...Shakespeare faculty from the department react to
  22. yumwatch likes this
  23. daysofstorm reblogged this from baker-street and added:
    LOL, I’ll still watch it, though, cause I’ll be able
  24. goo22 likes this
  25. mimesandpunishment likes this
  26. baker-street reblogged this from byronic and added:
    I’m surprised they went with the Oxfordian theory. If...was going to make this movie
  27. hughbot likes this
  28. nightswimming said: so was Joe Fiennes who wrote the plays or not??? the world needs to know
  29. fellowacrobat likes this
  30. hidingundertrees likes this
  31. katiecoyle likes this
  32. manyinwonderland likes this
  33. byronic posted this

Comments powered by Disqus

byronic :: mad bad and dangerous to know About Me
BA | MA | PhD
Italian, Londoner.
Ex theatre director.
Lecturer in film, literature, and cultural studies.
Beginner in the film industry.

Favourite tags
anton chekhov | art | baseball | bruce springsteen | buster keaton | design | eddie izzard | federico garcia lorca | film | food | guys in ties | italy | john irving | london | music | my life | photography | politics | ralph fiennes | reviews | space | theatre | tigers | travel | whales | writing |

Byronic
[bai'ra:-nik] 1. Characteristic of, or after the manner of Byron or his poetry. 2. quasi-n. pl. [after Philippics.] Declamatory utterances or invectives in the style of Byron. 3. Byronic hero: prominent literary character type of the Romantic period, whose characteristics include: extraordinary intelligence and perception; high level of education and intellectual prowess; arrogance; cunning and manipulation; emotional conflictedness; moodiness; self-criticism and introspection; self-destructive behaviour; aesthetic sophistication; dark mysterious beauty; powers of attraction; seductiveness and sexual perversion; world-weariness; distaste for social institutions and norms; disrespect of social ranks; being an outcast, an outlaw, or an exile.


Things You Should Know
You don't have to call me Doctor.
I worship at the Church of Springsteen.
I'm a card-carrying ophidiophobe.
"This is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules."

Contact

Ask me a question
Send me your Guys in Ties

My Other Homes
Flickr
Flavors.me
Instagram
JunkiePop
Movies in Frames
F*ck Yeah! Bruce Springsteen
Previous Next