Posted 6 hours ago

Guys in Ties #121: Jean Dujardin

Posted 16 hours ago

WTF tumblr?!

what’s with all the snakes tonight? There are at least five different posts with snakes on my dashboard right now, which makes it a no-go area for me. Please stop?

Posted 1 day ago

oldhollywood:

Clark Gable on the set of The Misfits (1961, dir. John Huston) (via)

Photographer: Eve Arnold

Posted 1 day ago

I love my local cinema

Posted 2 days ago

Patience (After Sebald) “is a multi-layered film essay on landscape, art, history, life and loss”. It is also a documentary of sorts, a “film in search of an author” - namely, writer and Wandersmann W.G. Sebald, the German-born, British-based author of The Rings of Saturn, Austerlitz, and On the Natural History of Destruction.

The Rings of Saturn is one the most successful experiments of psycho-geography in creative writing. It narrates stories about people and places, and it is organised to follow various walks (or one long walk) that Sebald took through East Anglia and Suffolk and along the coast. I have never read a book like it. That is, I have read many books that try to imitate its meandering structure and eclectic range, but never one as strong, persuasive, good.

Sebald’s work interweaves the local and the universal, the infinitely large and the infinitely minute. It moves effortlessly from history to literature, from anecdote to myth; it typically involves bio-chemistry and astronomy, physics and mechanics, and it deals with transportation, disease, military technology, voyages of discovery, the impermanence of man, and the permeability of borders. It is at once creative and documentary writing, in that by invention it conjures up times and places, people and objects, while at the same time describing and observing what is placed in front of the reader’s eyes as though it were an objective reality, a palpable landscape. Think Walter Benjamin meets Italo Calvino meets Stephen Hawking: there you have him.

I am not alone in my love of Sebald: film-maker Grant Gee has been equally obsessed with Sebald’s work, and the journeys - both imaginary and real - it prompts the reader to undertake. Gee’s film Patience (After Sebald) was screened for the first time almost exactly one year ago at a conference on Sebald, in which various members of my department were involved. Tonight it’s being screened followed by a Q&A at the Renoir cinema in Russell Square, and I’m really looking forward to seeing it.

Posted 2 days ago
When Sony launched the Walkman back in the late 70s, its main appeal was that for the first time in history you could stroll down the high street listening to Neil Diamond belting out Sweet Caroline and no one could judge you for it. It made you the master of a private world of music. If the Walkman had, by default, silently contacted your friends and told them what you were listening to, not only would no one have bought a Walkman in the first place, its designers would have been viewed with the utmost suspicion.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m all for sharing thoughts, no matter how banal (as every column I have ever written rather sadly proves). Humans will always babble. If someone wants to tweet that they can’t decide whether to wear blue socks or brown socks, then fair enough. But when sharing becomes automated, I get the heebie-jeebies. People already create exaggerated versions of themselves for online consumption: snarkier tweets, more outraged reactions. Online, you play at being yourself. Apply that pressure of public performance to private, inconsequential actions – such as listening to songs in the comfort of your own room – and what happens, exactly?
Posted 2 days ago

Fußgänger

My little brother is on tumblr! You can follow his adventures as a theatre director/PhD student of German theatre in Berlin here

Posted 3 days ago

Happy Chekhov’s Birthday *

Posted 4 days ago

Throughout the mid to late 1970s and upwards, Hiroshi Sugimoto packed up a folding 4x5 camera & tripod, surreptitiously entered matinees (and, one can only presume, evening film events) and documented the interior of movie theatres across the United States. He would open the shutter just before the ‘first light’ hit the screen and close it after the credits finished rolling and before the house lights came on. Using this method he was able to invert the subject/object relationship of the movie theatre and use the film itself to illuminate the proscenium and interior. This content, largely unaddressed critically, is what lends the images their incredible power — along wtih the natural fascination of being made privy to the photography’s divine birthright — allowing us to see the normally invisible, to experience a finite collapse of time.

(Source: forestmilk)

Posted 1 week ago

mightyflynn:

Neruda, ca. 1970

Latin American scholars today often express surprise at how few Americans remember Pablo Neruda’s days in baseball. Even most dedicated fans of the game remain unaware that in the spring of 1965, the renowned Chilean poet put in almost a month at third base far the New York Mets: He was sixty-one years old at the time. His short-lived career in baseball goes largely unremembered for two reasons, I believe. First, in the initial four years of their existence, the Mets experimented with a dozen or so third basemen, hoping to find one even minimally suited to the position. Second, to be frank, Latin American literature was not nearly so widely known in the United States then as it is now, especially among baseball fans. It is safe to say that no Latin writer of similar stature could play pro ball in North America today without attracting a great deal more attention than [Pablo] Neruda ever received. In fact, there is some evidence that Neruda, at best a barely proficient third baseman, took the job in order to relax: to escape for a while from the rig- ors of his art and from a deteriorating political situation at home. “I had a marvelous time in New York,” the poet told El Mercurio, Santiago’s largest daily, shortly after his triumphant return to Chile. “It could not have been a better experience for me.”

Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the Mets. Among the terrible third basemen the team has had, none was worse than Neruda. Over twenty-eight ball games in a four-week period Neruda saw seventy chances at the hot corner and muffed forty-five of them. In eighty-seven appearances at the plate he man- aged but one hit. And he was struck by pitches no fewer than seventeen times. “In the north the ball is thrown very fast,” he told El Mercurio. ”Sometimes I had difficulty escaping its path.” 

 - ”Neruda and the Mets” [excerpt] by Vincent Passaro 

Harper’s (May 1985), originally published in Willow Springs (Summer 1985)